Tuesday, March 13

Postmortem: Pakistan vs West Indies - Blame the batting, not Rana

Depressing game for Pakistani fans but an exciting victory for the West Indians. Again, I wouldn't be so ticked off if Pakistan had played better. A good game means both sides go back feeling pleased at the performance. But we had the game, and threw it away. The glaring holes in our squad are really beginning to come through. I knew the warm up games over Canada and South Africa didn't mean much and seems like we changed our strategy once again. We are missing Mohammad Asif and Shoaib Akhtar like no other.

It's easy for everyone to blame Rana Naveed for the loss. But he was just a part of it, and several players were to blame. So lets not Rana bash excessively and exclusively. Lets also put our bowling aside for a moment, and talk about the selection for the moment.

Though selecting Kaneria might have seemed like a stroke of genius to some, I am not convinced that he should even be part of the squad. I made my reservations to his inclusion quite clear in the past, but have since, been resigned to the fact, that what is done, is done. He is in the squad, will probably play till Afridi is back, and that's the world cup for him. A useless selection.

Kamran Abassi touched upon the second point with regards to this squad. If any of the batsmen gets injured, who the hell will take their place? Yasir Arafat? So weak...

Now Pakistan tried something new today and they must be given credit for it. They chose 4 specialist bowlers, including a spinner, and put faith in their batsmen. It is a good strategy and a sound one. Agreed, 2 of the bowlers were pretty crappy today, but the fact of the matter is, 240 was not unreachable. The batsmen are the ones who should be the ones scoring the bloody runs. Regardless of the bowling, the pitch was still good enough for 240 and they screwed it up.

We ALREADY know our bowling is weak. Which is why we bowl first. Our batting is SUPPOSED to be our strong point. Who was truly shocked that Rana and Kaneria got whipped? Not me. However, I was surprised that the meager pressure of a mere 240 runs completely fingered Nazir, Hafeez and Younis. I can understand a good delivery bamboozling them, and some tight bowling frustrating them. But I have no sympathy for retarded shots. Which brings us to...

Batting

Imran Nazir's time is up. I have joked about the rotation policy in the past, but this dude is a fucking idiot. He is far worse than Imran Farhat, and that is pretty insulting. Someone needs to bumjack him in the dressing room, so he can get injured, so that we can complain and whine to the ICC and send for Salman Butt. We could even help him fake an injury. It's been done before and I am sure there is an SOP lying there somewhere with the manager.

I can't complain about Hafeez. He did as well as he could, but the bugger needs to calm down and take it easy. He needs to stay for 10 overs at least, get his usual 49 runs and then bloody get out. What is the point of having openers who don't even get a bit of the shine off the new ball? What is wrong with the openers? Are they all on crack? Can they only slash and swing?

Our great one-down batsmen, Younis Khan, gets the most blame. Even more than Rana actually. What in the world was he doing? Did you see that shot? What the fuck? Ahh! I was okay with him being in the squad for a while, but dude, after this world cup is over, omarlovescricket is continuing its campaign to get rid of YK from the ODI team.

Yousuf got out to a frigging good delivery. What can one do? Inzi was unlucky with the decision. I think it was going over the wicket. Fuck what Hawkeye says!

Akmal is a choot. I hope Billu.net writes something up about this. I was about to throw my coffee into the aquarium when I saw him get out first ball.

Bowling

Rana is just about as good (or bad) as anyone else who can replace him. My argument is as follows. Can Sami, or Arafat, or even Azhar do a better job than Rana? I think the only advantage is that Arafat and Azhar can bat. Replacing Rana is not going to do the trick. Rana is out of form, but his potential as a bowler is far greater than the rest of them. I think Sami is decent, but even he is very expensive. Apart from Umar Gul, our bowling is bloody toothless in this World Cup, and we must remain resigned to the fact that Rana may just be as good as any other clown on the squad. We have no other choice people!

One could pad up the batting by selecting Arafat or Azhar, but that doesn't improve the bowling at all. Plus it releases the pressure on the batting. The top 6 batsman need to know that one of them HAS to score a bloody 70 or higher. They need to know that after Akmal (arguably before), there is no one else who can bat. Having a batting lineup stretching up till Mars is not the way we will win our games. We have to develop our bowling, give our specialist bowlers a chance to get into their rhythm, and lay the responsibility of scoring runs on the top order.

This squad is pretty weak and the gaps in our strategy are becoming a lot more apparent. Don't be too surprised if we're upset in the next couple of games.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

Iftikhar Anjum bowled sensibly. Is he good?

The Atheist said...

Why are you surprised? I told you what would happen.

Anonymous said...

Omar, I was wondering if you can guest post at www.cricketviewer.com ?

Unknown said...

King: Anjum was solid yesterday, but I think its a one time type thing. He held his line and length and usually is consistent with where he pitches. I think he's a decent bowler but nothing exceptional. He bowls outswing mainly and is a bit nippy. Not quite as skiddy as Sami, but I think he did better yesterday, just because WI could capitalize on Rana and Kaneria.

I don't expect him to take a 4 wicket haul anytime soon


Atheist: Yeah - you bloody got the score right. Nice job.

Unknown said...

Kashif,

Sure. Email me if you like

Unknown said...

honestly, replacing rana is not going to help at all. he's our main fastbowler and azharmahmood hasn't played in awhile either.

wtf is wrong with our batting lineup

Bonanza SEO Blogger said...

Salaams Omar,

You rock. I felt like I was reading my own assessment. I am going to be with you this whole World Cup.

Let's simply pray we win 2 more, and then play spoiler in the Super 8s.

At first I was quite let down by our performance in Jamaica, then I realized, give or take 10%, that is about our team's aukat.

Bro, for one second imagine yourself as an objective cricket fan >

M. Hafeez and Nazir?

Now picture: Hayden/Gilchrist. Too much? OK fine Smith/whoever... still too much? Jayasuriya/Tharanga?

I think you get my point. There is not a worse opening pair in the top 8. On paper or off paper.

Guys I worked for the Pakistan Cricket Board in 2000. I know how these guys work, let me tell you one thing. I support them because as a Pakistani, I got nothing else. Never forget that if you were born Venezuelan, you would not give 2 shits.

That being said, my ass will still watch every delivery of every match they play until I am in the grave. Only a Pakistani cricket fan can understand these dysfunctional rants.

OK now just remember Younis's paddle swap to slip (my Driver from Sargodha would even leave those alone), Hafeez's HUGE swing to Lara's Lap, and Akmal's dashing drive. WTF man, are you guys professionals?

The masla is simply this chaps. The rest of the world keeps improving. Remember when NZ was a cakewalk, Sri Lanka was a walkover? Remember when Zimbabwe meant smacking your lips?

What happened? We did not get worse. They got better. In the middle somewhere we had Wasim and Aaqib, but please do not forget this was LONG BEFORE a strike rate of 80 was common parlance.

OK I am going off on a rant when I promised myself I would enjoy this month as a celebration of cricket.

I work with 40 Indian guys (no points for guessing, I am in IT), and not a single one of them enjoyed our loss, I could see in their eyes that they were sad that we are not even a contender. So gone are we that even our nemesis says "whatever".

Mo Khan (that's me) World Cup X1 (injuries included, but with better selection):

Salman Butt
Yasir Hameed (Imran Farhat backup)
Shoaib Malik (runs the 1s,2s,smacks, Pak captain)
Inzimam
Yousuf
Younis
Afridi
Akmal (listen we got nobody else, plus his century in Mohali and rescue act in Karachi bought him 5 years)
Arafat (until Rana clears his head)
Gul
Iftikhar (Azhar option)

Share your XI with me.

Oh and PS - Bob Woolmer can kiss my Paki ASS. You picked South Africa and went for some cold ones after we lost? Mar jaa dalay.

Omar said...

The answer is...YES...Sami is a better option than Rana. Its not a matter of "he's as bad as everyone else". Rana has been consistently sucking ass the last 6 months. When someone performs bad, you drop his ass. Potential or not, you reward good performances and you drop ass-suckers. Rana is not going to learn if he doesnt get dropped, and if he really is as bad as everyone else then we have nothing to lose.

ugyen said...

sorry pakistani fan about the loss, cheer up..and yeah my Team Black Caps will do wonder.. omar, sorry mate, couldn't just walk into you rblog, guess what..i am still without tv line.. "grin"!!!

Unknown said...

Aneeqa - In hindsight you were right. It was the batting that did us in

Unknown said...

Mo - Thanks for the comments!Appreciate your support. Sorry for my late response. I shall scour our comment now and respond to it. Please let me know what you think.

I liked your rant a lot. So lets. I like your XI too actually. Without Inzi there, now we need a middle order batsman.

And you're right. The other countires keep improving their cricket, keep figuring out how to play on grass, or seaming wickets, and yet, Pakistani batsmen are stuck in the same old trough.

Anyway, we're out of this world cup.

Unknown said...

Omar, yeah - in hindsight, sami bowled his fucking heart out but to no avail.

The issue was always with the batsmen and never with the bowlers...