Friday, December 29

Vacation, Christmas gifts and Poll Results

Vacation was lazy...
I am back from vacation! Got some great Christmas gifts too. Seeing how my life revolves around cricket, it was no surprise that my friends bought me the appropriate gifts. I still pretended to be surprised though!

The booty...
The girlfriend bought Cricket and the Law for me! Thanks S! This is a bit of a heavier read but it discusses cricket's evolution, the rules, how they came to be broken, the fine line between sportsmanship and the law. Quite cool. Pakistan is featured quite a bit! Hmm...I wonder why!?

Another friend bought Cricket's Strangest Matches for me. I had been eyeing this book for a while now. But ofcourse its always less fun when one has to buy it himself. Been through a few pages so far and It's quite cool. It goes way back to crickets first games. Though not certain, I believe it includes games up till the early 90's.

Though I didn't get a gift subscription, my friend from England sent me a single magazine issue that I had not heard of...All Out Cricket. I like it. Darren Gough is the guest editor for this issue. Though its expensive to subscribe to it, the website doesn't offer subscriptions to the US. Strange! I emailed the folks there. Lets see what they say.

Poll predicts South African victory
So the omarlovescricket poll of the fortnight has revealed that 63 percent of the world* thinks South Africa will win the test series against India. More on this later

*19 people to be precise

Friday, December 22

Doping Scandal continues: WADA files appeal

As everyone expected, save the PCB who assumed they were now in the clear, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has officially filed an appeal in the Court of Sports Arbitration. They want the ban on Shoaib and Asif to be instated. From IHT...

WADA appealed that decision on Thursday to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, based in Lausanne, Switzerland. "WADA believes that the decision to overturn the sports sanctions is not in conformity with the World Anti-Doping Code," WADA spokesman Frederic Donze said in a statement Friday. "WADA has determined that it has the right — and the duty — to appeal in the circumstances in the interest of doping-free sport."

Can the players compete while this appeals process is occurring?

Now the PCB are really screwed. I doubt they ever thought it would come to this. The world is watching the PCB again. How will they respond...

Thursday, December 21

My Pakistan starting test and ODI XI

After soundly defeating the West Indies, Pakistan have a nice problem on their hands. Many good players for a few spots. With Shoaib and Asif returning, it calls for some intense rethinking. Kamran Abbasi, in his blog, recently called on fans to suggest their teams. So here I present my teams for both formats, assuming Shoaib and Asif play. Comments welcome!

ODI starting XI

  1. Kamran Akmal (k)
  2. Mohd. Hafeez
  3. Yasir Hameed
  4. Younis Khan
  5. Inzamam ul Haq (c)
  6. Mohd. Yousuf
  7. Abdul Razzak
  8. Abdur Rehman
  9. Shoaib Akhtar
  10. Umar Gul
  11. Mohd. Asif
ODI Notes:
  • If Akmal develops his technique and plays as an opener permanently, he solves 2 problems. Firstly, the opener gap, and secondly he allows for the specialist spinner, rather than the allrounder to play.
  • Rehman, the specialist left arm spinner, is a must in my ideal ODI XI. He is attacking and restrictive. Agreed, his debut was impressive, and he will eventually have his bad days, but on the whole, he will be really useful.
  • It's really important for both my squads to have at least 4 wicket-taking bowlers. Having a spinner just jazzes it up a bit.
  • Razzak over Shoaib Malik? Just because of recent form. Both are great timers. In fact, I chose Mohd. Hafeez over Malik just because of this reason. I feel Malik is better option than both Hafeez and Razzak, though he isn't in form.
  • Why Younis? You might have read my tirades in the past over Younis Khan. But I have to select around him. There is no way he won't play.
Test starting XI
  1. Mohd. Hafeez
  2. Yasir Hameed
  3. Younis Khan
  4. Inzamam ul Haq (c)
  5. Mohd. Yousuf
  6. Asim Kamal
  7. Kamran Akmal (k)
  8. Shoaib Akhtar
  9. Umar Gul
  10. Danish Kaneria
  11. Mohd. Asif
Test Notes
  • Playing Asim Kamal is the big thing here. I think he will be really useful down the order. this guy has an uncomplicated technique. He won't be bothered to much by the bounce that Ntini and Pollock will throw at him. He has mustered together the tail in the past to score his runs. An ideal 4-down.
  • Kaneria will play no matter how much I like Rehman. I chose Hafeez as the allrounding opener, since he is in form.

WADA aims to challenge Shoaib, Asif doping reprieve

I doubted the ICC and WADA would let Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif off as easily. I am guessing a long and arduous legal battle will probably ensue. I don't know why the PCB are being so naive and stubborn about this. The matter is NOT closed, which is what the PCB are claiming. This whole process has made Pakistan look bad according to international eyes. Whether or not the players are innocent is not even the question anymore. The legality, transparency and appeals process that was applied is in question. The ICC and WADA are joining hands and probably have the authority to put their foot down and order re-testing, or perhaps place the ban again on the players. From the IHT...

ICC chief executive officer Malcolm Speed said his organization will offer WADA its full support.

"Our lawyers have examined the finding of the (Pakistan appeals panel) and do not believe the ICC has a right of appeal, but we will cooperate with WADA and provide it with any assistance it requires," Speed said Monday.

The World Anti-Doping Agency will argue to the Court of Arbitration of Sport that Pakistan is a full member of the ICC, which signed up to its code in July.

Seems like the PCB is preparing to defend its decision to the hilt. I just hope this happens well before the World Cup.

Warne, McGrath and now Harmison retire

Retirements in cricket, it seems, are cyclic. A few players announce their departure within a season of each other. They come in patches, and may or may not, mark the end of certain style of cricket that that particular team plays. It's too early to tell what affect Warne and McGrath's retirement will have on Australian cricket. And we still have 2 more tests to go. Since its all happening so fast, one probably wont be surprised if Langer and Hayden hang up their bats. One thing is for sure though. This Ashes meant a whole lot more to Australia. Announcing your retirement after retaking the series so emphatically, indicates how satisfied they are with their accomplishments, and how they would like to end their international careers on a high.

Though McGrath's retirement is still yet to be confirmed, its still a whole lot of retirement talk this past month. Martyn announced it after the 2nd test while Boje silently parted ways with South Africa soon after. I assumed McGrath would stay till the World Cup. Harmisson, on other hand, bar a game here or there, had become a liability for England in ODI's.

The big news is Shane Warne though. Sad day for cricket. As far as I can remember, he's been cocky, arrogant, and a his rise to cricking stardom coincided with Australia's dominance this past decade. He's been an incredible part of Australia's success. There is no doubt that he is the best at what he does. The numbers speak for themselves. But more than that, he was an integral part of the Aussie aggressive, in your face, mind games, which propelled them to the top and intimidated all others.

Wednesday, December 20

Probables for Pakistan's tour of South Africa announced

25 probables have been named for the Pakistan tour of South Africa. No real surprises here.

I doubt all 4 openers would be making the trip, but they might as well, since the selectors like rotating them. I hope Farhat doesn't accompany the squad though. He may have scraped together a few runs against the West Indies, but there was nothing attractive about his game play. If he doesn't get selected, Salman Butt will probably take his place. Salman did well against Australia on their bouncy wickets 2 years back. Hameed is probably going to go, though with Inzi, MoYo and Younis returning, he will either be the opener or won't play. The middle order has no space for him in either format. I am in favor of putting Hameed as an opener. I think he's a lot better than Farhat, and has the capability to score big. Farhat seems to lose focus once he crosses 50. Though, as I have mentioned before, Pakistan has chosen so many openers in the past few years, that I have numbed myself to any choice. Just choose 2 and lets get on with it.

Zulqarnain Haider has been named and invited to the training camp. There is no doubt that he probably being conditioned to take over Kamran's position after Akmal retires or isn't in favor anymore. I think its great that the selectors are thinking ahead and also giving this young lad the opportunity to train with the senior players and get some exposure to Woolmer and the coaching staff. Secondly it might spur Akmal to concentrate more. After a dismal English summer with both the gloves and the bat, a little heat and pressure on him won't do him any harm.

Asim Kamal and Faisal Iqbal are the middle order additions. One of them should definitely play in the test matches. My vote is for Asim as he did well against South Africa on his debut, is a compact player and, more importantly puts a price on his wicket. Faisal is talented and I'd like to see him in the ODI's.

The problem with the pacemen is that now we have a lot of choice. In Shoaib and Asif's absence, Umar Gul, Nazir, Rana have really shown that they aren't just fill-in-the-gap bowlers, but genuine wicket taking pacemen. Gul, in particular, has been a persoanl favorite of mine, since he bowled Laxman in Lahore, 2 years back. He is a shoe-in for both formats.

From PCB.com.pk...
Openers

Imran Farhat
Mohammad Hafeez
Yasir Hameed
Salman Butt

Middle Order
Younis Khan
Mohammad Yousuf
Inzamam-ul-Haq
Faisal Iqbal
Asim Kamal

Allrounders
Abdul Razzaq
Shahid Afridi
Shoaib Malik
Yasir Arafat

Spinners
Danish Kaneria
Abdur Rehman

Pace bowlers
Shoaib Akhtar
Mohammad Asif
Shahid Nazir
Naved-ul-Hasan
Umar Gul
Mohammad Sami
Iftikhar Anjum
Shabbir Ahmed

Keepers
Kamran Akmal
Zulqarnain Haider

Sunday, December 17

England can't win....can they?

226 runs required of 72 overs...

Flintoff on 51 off 66 balls.

Peitersen is 50 off 128 deliveries.

Both are batting well and have attacked Australia this morning. Do you think they can do it!?

UPDATE: Nevermind. I spoke too soon. Flintoff and Jones out.

Saturday, December 16

Australia ruthless

I went to bed after Hussey made his century thinking Australia were well and truly in charge of this game. I felt sorry for England. But they seemed to bowl with no strategy. Australia, on the other hand, amended their first innings mistakes, conquered Harmisson and Panesar, and set about trying to win the test match. Drawing the game was never an option for the Aussies.

They were in control of the situation. Clarke and Hussey were dancing down the pitch, taking singles on both sides of the wicket, and smashing boundaries at will.

Naturally, I didn't think anything more would shock me afterI woke up this morning, got my cup of coffee, and checked the scoreboard.

My goodness. 102 from 59 deliveries? Are you kidding me?

Gilchrist has effectively ended this series! His onslaught, though I haven't seen it yet on reply, must have been incredibly demoralizing. No wonder most bowlers chose Gilchrist as the "World's Scariest Batsman".

The Aussies have not only given it to England like no other, but they have embarrassed the opposition beyond belief. England have been put in their place. Their Ashes win last year was an anomaly. What I am enjoying about this is how confidant everyone in their camp seemed to be coming in this Ashes series. All the talk in their media was Ashes, Ashes Ashes and how they were the 2nd best test team in the World. Their thrashing at the hands of Sri Lanka and Pakistan was a clear indicator that their class was temporary. Australia don't look like they are going to let up. I am no one to predict but 5-0 seems like the likely scenario. Save face and fly home now is my advice to the English camp.

Friday, December 15

Malinga rocks!

I like this guy. He bowls full tosses and gets people bowled! He's quite the town of the town in New Zealand these days. He just wrecked their top order and got a 5 wicket haul in the first inning of the second test. They're definitely finding him too hard to read and have no clue what hit them.

That's awesome.

What I don't like is all the excuses the New Zealanders are making. Apparently the umpires black trousers are distracting their vision when he bowls! I heard the commentators say something about how the umpire gets in the way.

You know what? Stop making excuses. If you're getting bowled on full tosses, there is something wrong with your technique and footwork. As soon as anyone comes up with a unique action, people start complaining about how its not cricket and all that nonsense. I even read a couple of forums where these fools were accusing Malinga of chucking!

What rubbish! Malinga is cool, has a fun haircut and is aggressive (bowls either at the batsman's head or their feet!). His action is slingy, and not a chuck and all this make him an exciting player to watch.

Wednesday, December 13

Monty on fire!!!

Oh! How England must be regretting not playing Panesar in the first 2 test matches! This is great stuff from him on a day one pitch. If only this were the 1st test and not the 3rd...

On a side note, its great sportsmanship how Gilchrist chooses to walk. That's pretty respectable in today's game.

Poll shows 97% of the world* thinks Australia will win the Ashes

There you have it folks. The people have spoken. Australia will win the Ashes.

Though some might say 30 is too small of a polling number to make such broad-based assumptions, I shall stand by my poll and claim that it was a fair survey. I feel 30 a fairly decent sub-section of our populace, and this blog probably attracts a diverse community! The blog stats, after all, indicate that most of my visitors actually hail from the UK. So, in conclusion, 29 to 1, or 97% feel the Aussies will win.

In other news, I shall update my blog poll of the week...umm every week.

*refers to the 30 chaps who took my poll.

Tuesday, December 12

4th ODI Team selection

Pakistan are 45/3 after 15 overs.

Afridi has failed as usual. He got bowled to an outswinger. He should not have been in the squad. He should not have been in the team. He should not be in our World Cup plans....yet we stick with him. In case you're wondering how I can back up my claims for his withdrawal...wonder no more. Browse these charts at your own perusal.

Imran Farhat made a streaky 13. He swung and missed for 36 deliveries. Most of my friends hate Farhat. I am indifferent and have numbed up to him now.

The ball is swinging a bit. Its a bit bouncy out there. When your established middle order is not playing for any reason, the selectors should have thought about middle order order batsmen as replacements. Regurgitating these allrounders and openers is so futile. There is dull sense of 'been there, done that' when I see the squad. The 5 people who came out to bat are all openers. I would give anything to trade them in for any 3 middle order batsmen on Pakistani domestic scene....

Pakistan are 47/4 after 17 overs. Shoaib Malik just played across the line and was caught plum chilling out in front of the wicket. Can I get no respite? I'm trying to write a blog post here. Just need 5 overs with no wickets falling.

Why are Umar Gul and Abdur Rehman not playing this game? I hope they're sick with the flu or something because I can't think of any reason why they shouldn't play. Umar Gul might need a rest, but Rehman was awesome for the first 2 ODI's. He was restrictive and attacking with incredible control.

All in all, I am not happy

Life without Younis, Yousuf, Inzamam...

With a 2-0 lead, we should be thanking our lucky stars that the series can't be lost! Tomorrows game, though not inconsequential, is going to be quite amusing, and unpredictable from Pakistan's point of view. If Razzak is made captain, it will be due to his seniority and nothing else. He hasn't exactly got the leadership credentials. Shoaib Malik, who has captained his domestic team in many games, would probably be my choice.

I have some concerns, however, about tomorrow's game against the West Indies. Not only is there no clearly defined leader left in the camp, but there are characters on the team that are louder than most. Afridi, if he plays, is not one to keep his opinions to himself. He has 200+ games, and quite rightly so, considers himself as a senior player. In fact, Afridi probably has the most leadership qualities that one desires in a captain....yet he is barely making this squad.

Cricket, more than other sports, needs a captain that everyone can turn to. I just hope the game doesn't turn out to be a free for all. Then again, its only 1 game. But I like to worry...

Anyway...

Regardless of captaincy, pressure will be on the batsmen to perform. There will come a time when Younis, Yousuf and Inzi will not longer be playing, and these fellows will have to start shouldering the burden. This is as good a time as any to see how good the Pakistani batting bench strength is.

Monday, December 11

Shoaib Akhtar probably not too happy with this photo

This picture cracks me up! A bunch of the cricket blogs I frequent have put it up, so I didn't feel the need to. I thought it would be best if I forwarded you to my friend's blog who titled it adequately, and then tied it in to his post! Check it out!

Afridi recalled for the 4th ODI against West Indies

Mohammad Yousuf's wife is sick, Younis Khan's brother passed away, and Inzamam's injured finger may not heal in time. Pakistan's enviable middle order might be absent for the 4th ODI game. In order to cover for this, the selectors have send in Faisal Iqbal and Shahid Afridi. I can understand Iqbal. He is a steady batsman, with sound technique and he did well for us in England.

Why in the world is Afridi back? Will he really aid the team in any possible way? The selectors are nuts. I am sure there are a bunch of middle order batsmen out there in Pakistan, any of whom would be a better choice.

On the bright side, he seems to be in form. From CricInfo...

Afridi was dropped after the Champions Trophy, the first time in two years for anything other than an injury or suspension. But he has struck a rich vein of form in domestic cricket for Habib Bank and lies third in the bowling averages after five games with 22 wickets at an average of under ten. And despite starting poorly with the bat, he has just hit a 91-ball hundred in the ongoing game against WAPDA, whose attack includes Mushtaq Ahmed and Shabbir Ahmed. He scored a fifty in a low-scoring first-innings total and also picked up three wickets.
I'm still not convinced...

Saturday, December 9

It's all about the Benjamins: ICC rights sold for $1.1 billion

From CricInfo...

The ICC's television rights for 2007-2015 have been sold to ESPN-Star, a joint venture between ESPN and the Rupert Murdoch-owned Star network, reportedly for a staggering "$1.1 billion", double the previous amount for the same period of time.

Included in the eight-year period under discussion are 18 ICC tournaments with two ICC Cricket World Cups, in Asia (2011) and Australasia (2015), and a minimum of three ICC Champions Trophy tournaments. Also included are the first two ICC Twenty20 World Championships, in South Africa (2007) and England (2009), the latter taking place in the ICC's centenary year.

"We are absolutely delighted that, after an open and transparent process, we have what we believe to be the best deal for cricket," Percy Sonn, the ICC president, said immediately after decision was announced.

"However, the Board was unanimous in the view that the ESPN STAR Sports bid was the best, and we believe all of our 97 Members will gain significant benefit from an agreement with ESPN STAR Sports.

No doubt about it...Commercialization of this beautiful sport is expanding in leaps and bounds. Though from the wording, it implies that there will be 3 more Champions Trophy's during that time period.

97 member nations? What the hell is he talking about?

Muralitharan's runout

Charlie Austin's bulletin from CricInfo...


...Sangakkara glanced a single to bring up his century.

But as Sangakkara started to raise his hands aloft in celebration, Muralitharan had a brainstorm, tapping his bat into the crease and then leaving it again to congratulate Sangakkara while the ball was still live. Brian Jerling, the square leg umpire, motioned to Muralitharan that over had not been called, but it was too late and Brendon McCullum whipped off the bails. Muralitharan may justifiably claim that the dismissal was not within the spirit of the game, but it was within the letter of the law and, for a cricketer of his immense experience, it was a moment of unpardonable madness.

Now lets be honest here. It was unsportsman-like of New Zealand. Screw the letter of the law. In situations like these, the entire world is willing to shove the 'letter'. Murali was clearly not running the second run and had already made his ground. I was shocked to see it unfold on tv. And after you make your ground, you're bloody safe. Its common sense, after all. It was the end of the over and the leg umpire was already walking towards to the crease. Sangakarra had just made such an important century, shuffling around with the tail and it was plain to see the New Zealanders were desperate to get the last wicket.

The umpire had no choice but to give it out. He has to follow the rules. There is no fault there but if he had let it pass, it wouldn't be such an issue either.

New Zealand should not have appealed. McCullum is a bastard.

Friday, December 8

Ganguly's comeback

With any other player on the comeback trail, so much attention would seem unwarranted. But this is Saurav Ganguly, a man who inspires and infuriates. I read with great interest how he showed up to practice straight from the airport. How he interacted with the team, how he started practicing. I read with fascination about the 17 year old South African under-19 bowler who bowled at him in the nets. Usually one couldn't be bothered with the fine details of Ganguly's every movement, but these are not usual circumstances.

The story became even more dramatic when he grinded out 83 in his first tour game back. Some observers claimed that he was at his best. Definitely a great start, seeing as the top order failed. The second innings brought it all down to earth, however, where he lasted only a couple of deliveries and scored nothing.

Well, its still interesting to note how everyone is following his every movements. How Greg Chapell greeted him, how the players high-fived him, or did anyone hug him? What did the coach say about him after his 83? Did he change his stance or something?

Such details! But so interesting nevertheless...

He's a shoe-in to play in the first test match after his performance in this game. That's going to be the real test. Sadly Ganguly has not had the immense star power than Tendulkar has enjoyed, and as a result he has been asked to prove a lot more. Tendulkar, in my opinion, has been far from stellar this past year. Yet Tendulkar is on a different plane, and is assessed on a different level. It's unfair, but as an outsider, it seems that Ganguly thrives in situations like these.

The cricketing world is eagerly awaiting the first test match against South Africa. All eyes will be on Saurav. Will he deliver?

Debutant Abdur Rehman impressive

I couldn't even find a picture of Abdur Rehman on CricInfo or the internet, but one thing is for sure, he was quite impressive on his debut against the Windies. He has a lot of control and more importantly, he bowled to his field. Inzamam understandably kept his long-off and long-on fielders near the ropes. It was the middle overs, and as a spinner was making his debut, there was no telling how nervous he might be or if the Windies would attack him. Safe bet in the end.

Turns out Rehman did well, and in hindsight Inzi should have probably brought in the men to mid on and mid off, to attack the batsmen more. Rehman gives the ball a quick whirl, has enough loop and is a very attacking left arm bowler. Very similar to Panesar in my opinion. He played with a packed off-side field and bowled on off and just outside off so that those fielders would come into play. The right handers found him troubling. Samuels, for one thing, kept misreading his turn and was eventually out to one that brought Younis Khan at first slip into action. The ball rose up on him while Samuels drove towards cover.

Dwayne Smith was LBW to a perfect arm-ball. Still too early to say, but I like what I see so far. It would be interesting to see if he can be continue to be wicket-taking and containing at the same time. 2-20 on debut is something he would probably be very happy with. I'd like to see him play the rest of the games as well. He may be a really good candidate for our World Cup plans. If all goes well, there is the chance that Pakistan may return to those successful days in the 90's when we played specialist spinners in ODI's (Saqlain and Mushtaq). I'd be up for that and Rehman could very well be our man.

Thursday, December 7

Damien Martyn retires

One of Australia's most dependable batsmen, Damien Martyn announced his retirement today. A bit sudden don't you think? And during the Ashes too. Doubt it will effect the outcome though, since rumors pointed towards Andrew Symonds playing in his place anyway. I'd like to say something about him, but I guess he was one of those players who let his bat do the talking for him.

Though wasn't he the fellow who pushed Sharad Powar during the Champions Trophy presentation ceremony?

But you might be wondering how I can tie this up and relate it to Pakistan. Well, while going through his career stats, it was interesting to note that his career test average, as it stands now, is 46.38. His average against Pakistan, however, was a lofty 61.57, which is almost 15 runs higher! Thats also his highest test average against any opponent.

But wait...there's more!

His ODI average against Pakistan though, is on the opposite end of the spectrum. After 28 ODI's, he averaged just 28.31 which incidentally is his lowest average against any country! How interesting is that?

Well, I think it is!

Pakistan just barely edges past West Indies in second ODI

Pakistan won the game by two wickets but your resident pessimist wasn't too ecstatic about the outcome. These close games, though usually quite fun to watch, are quite of the indicative of the downward slide in the fortunes of our ODI team. There was nothing encouraging about how we struggled to chase 152. It's evident that cracks still remain in our ODI unit and not much is improving. For one thing, is anyone else even wondering why we're playing so many all-rounders? We played 3 yesterday. Razzak, Malik, and Hafeez...

There are some positives. So Afridi is out. Good. And we played 4 specialist bowlers. Better! But then in Yousuf's absence, we continue to play our bits an pieces players on pitches that have something to offer. Have we not learned our lessons in England and during the Champions Trophy?

Needless to say, I am not too satisfied with this strategy. It may work while we play on our soil (though these latest pitches seem a bit odd), but its definitely going to backfire on South African pitches. Do we realize who we are going to be coming up against? Ntini, Pollock, Nel and company just completed their white-wash of India. SA are going to bounce us out till we cry.

Now I'm satisfied with any 2 out of Hafeez, Shoaib Malik and Imran Farhat for the opening slot. They're decent players, but we can all safely agree, that they're not the most technically sound batsmen. Hafeez and Farhat seem to have temporarily secured their opening slot for the time being, but Malik has not been too convincing of late. He has to shoulder the responsibility of a middle order batsmen, which he is clearly not...plus he's not really performing well of late. Yasir Hameed is in the squad. Let him have a game.

Malik, however, should be in our WC plans, as he IS a good batsmen and has done well for Pakistan in the one-down position. That position for the time being though, has been occupied by our VC, Younis Khan. I think he should be left out for the next game. I understand that he was probably Mohd. Yousuf's replacement, but shouldn't one replace a middle order batsmen with someone similar?

So the point being, we played with 7 guys yesterday who can bowl and bat, when I feel we should probably have replaced one of them at least with a specialist batsmen. Faisal Iqbal, Yasir Hameed are names that come to mind.

Wednesday, December 6

As expected, everyone and their mother begins slamming lifting of doping ban

“If I'm walking into a shit storm I want to know which way the wind's blowing”...wise words from Nathan Muir (Robert Redford) in Spy Games. After I wasted 8$ on that movie, this line was probably the only thing that I cared to remember from that crappy film. Somehow or the other, while I was reading all the posts, blogs, and opinion commentaries this morning....the quote came to me and I felt it was quite appropriate for the current situation.

The PCB, which has really bungled one thing after another this year, must have expected this storm...don't know if they knew the direction of the wind though! They can't be that naive, can they?. But they are getting slammed left, right, and center, and rightly so. Their credibility is tarnished and the entire process is nothing but a joke now. My thoughts on this verdict are presented below and were published yesterday...

The Australian boasts a sports headline entitled "Pakistan plays by own rules"...

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) appears to have played the cricket world off a break after an appeals board reversed the drug bans of Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif.

As unjust and embarrassing as this decision appears, the PCB can, not for the first time, continue to thumb its nose at the game with impunity because of cricket's shambolic structure.
The article argues that..
At the very least the cricketers should have been forced to prove how the banned substance entered their bodies. This is a prerequisite for a reduction of the sanction under the "exceptional circumstances" rule.

If the bans against Shoaib and Asif are not reinstated then, a little more than a month after the ICC sacked umpire Darrell Hair in disgraceful circumstances and agreed to re-admit pariah Zimbabwe into the Test arena next year, the cricket world will be left without credibility. Yet again.
Well, that parting shot about Hairgate is understandable from an Australian paper. Though the public may differ, Pakistan's daily's weren't too ecstatic. As reported by the IndiaTimes...
"Regardless of a split decision among the three-member review panel that heard their appeals, both Shoaib and Asif have in fact been proved to have taken a banned substance. No review panel in the world can change that fact," an editorial in 'The Post' said.

In the hard-hitting editorial, titled "A strange let-off", it said if the decision of the tribunal was driven by subjective reasons rather than hard evidence, why did they not assign any weight to the pride of Pakistan cricket that would be damaged by fielding two established dope cheaters.

"A nation's pride is much more valuable than the pride of any individual. If by some miracle, Pakistan can win the World Cup utilizing two druggies, will it add to the pride of our nation," it wondered. In a special article, 'The Nation' ridiculed Pakistan Cricket Board Chairman Dr. Naseem Ashraf for singing different tunes.

"In what is tantamount to a most stunning total reversal, the tribunal reviewing the appeals of Pakistan's pace spearheads in its verdict has acquitted the duo, overturning the one and two year bans respectively imposed by a PCB tribunal only 34 days ago," it said.

The decision may come as a huge relief for the Pakistan cricket team but the risks of "disgrace" by bringing the two back could be great, it said.
The most important and influential player in this process might probably be WADA, the World Anti Doping Agency. From Reuters...
WADA official Frederic Donze told a Pakistani newspaper that the appeals commission's decision appeared to be unreasonable and a violation of the international anti-doping code.

"We have decided to take up the matter with the ICC. My personal view is that the decision taken by the Pakistan Cricket Board panel is unreasonable," Donze was quoted as saying in The News on Wednesday. Donze said WADA would first look into the decision of the tribunal before making further comments.
On the other end of the spectrum, Brian Lara, who is currently in Pakistan urged people to not jump to conclusions...
West Indies captain Brian Lara urged respect on Wednesday for a decision by the Pakistan Cricket Board to clear bowlers Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif of doping and said he hoped there would not be a negative reaction. "We must respect the decision of the Pakistan board. They are people of integrity in there," Lara told a news conference before the second one-day international on Thursday. "I just hope that the negativity surrounding this case does not spiral into anything else," he said.
As far as the ICC goes, Percy Sonn said...
"..the judgment of an appellate tribunal to revoke the bans imposed hardly a month ago showed that there were "inconsistencies" in Pakistan's anti-doping process.

"The judgment highlights inconsistencies in the Pakistan Cricket Board's anti-doping processes and regulations," Sonn said in a statement.

"Cricket has taken significant strides forward in addressing the important issue of drug use in our sport. However, this judgment emphasizes that much more work needs to be done to educate players and to synchronize our Members' efforts to attain a totally drug-free sport," he said.
The under-fire PCB chairman Nasib Ashraf was firmly standing by the appeals process, with WADA chief Dick Pound disagreeing....
Nasib Ashraf, PCB chairman, said after the appeal panel's decision that neither the ICC nor WADA could overturn the Akhtar and Asif verdict. "The ICC or WADA cannot intervene because the doping tests were conducted out of competition by the PCB, and the chapter is now closed," Ashraf said.

WADA head Dick Pound disagreed with the appeal panel's assertion that the players should have been warned. "No, it's quite clear that if you are an international athlete, you've got to be aware of the risks," Pound said. "You don't get any points for saying someone forgot to warn me."
Well...the next step seems to be fresh doping tests for both these players...Lets see where we go from there.

Tuesday, December 5

What a farce! Ban for Shoaib and Asif overturned

Is this a joke? Barely a month after the PCB slaps bans on Shoaib and Asif, their appeals tribunal overturns them. This is ridiculous. The entire cricketing world is laughing at us. These is no way that they will be willing to accept this verdict, especially since the PCB paraded them as guilty and left them out to dry. This whole process stinks of incompetence, with the powers-that-be, possibly protecting the star players of the national team. There is no doubt in my mind that the initial verdict was hasty. As my colleague in the blogging world points out, there seemed to be a rush to decision making by the PCB.

They rushed to judgment, and now the country looks like a bunch of bumbling idiots. They should have played it safer earlier. They should have either: (1) stuck to their time-honored traditions of secrecy and dealt with the matter behind closed doors; or (2) opened it to the world and had a proper trial - not one where the sentence was, as it appears, pre-determined, but a real and proper and final one.

What has happened is neither here nor there. And it is shameful. And it makes us look shady.
I'd like to point out that initially, though I felt it was all happening to fast and it might be hasty, I welcomed the ban as the correct and fair decision. This is because I never imagined a complete acquittal being the eventual scenario, plus I assumed a fair and thorough trial.

The PCB were so hell-bent on protecting their own skin. They made the test results public as soon as possible, removed Asif and Akhtar from the Champions squad, thus saving themselves from the embarrassment of a rumored ICC doping test. The PCB, which usually keeps its inner workings and secrets tighter than the KGB, suddenly became the most righteous cricketing authority in the world, handing down 'justice' and verdicts like no other. They banned their rising phenomenon, Mohammed Asif and their tried and tested match winner, Shoaib Akhtar. What a show!

Will the ICC recognize this new verdict? Does the World Doping Agency have a say in this matter? I'm sure they will. Osman Samiuddin's piece in cricinfo hints towards their possible involvement.

The ICC did not have any immediate reaction. "Malcolm Speed is currently in Uganda and we can't comment on the issue unless we have all the details," said Brian Murgatroyd, the ICC spokesman. "We need to go through the judgment and also get the PCB's version before making any comment."

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), in charge of monitoring drugs in sport, said they needed to discuss the matter with the ICC. Frederic Donze, their media relations officer, told Cricinfo: "We will now review the reasons for the decision, liaise with the ICC and consider whether to exercise its right of appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport."

Amidst all this turmoil, the players themselves are awaiting a comeback, and are obviously being brought up for selection. This may not be so simple. From BBC...
Pakistan have resisted the temptation to recall key pacemen Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif for Thursday's second one-day international with West Indies. Neither has played since September and chief selector Wasim Bari said: "I will have to talk to the other selectors before deciding when to consider them."
Let's just wait and see what happens, but I don't think they should play till the ICC and WADA have come to their conclusions. Since 'exceptional circumstances' as being defined differently by the PCB, ICC or WADA came up as the crux of their defense, I suspect some more tests are in order. The ICC which happily accepted the tribunals initial verdict may not be so accommodating to this one.

This process has been embarrassing, taxing and waste of time. I have a feeling Pakistanis are probably overjoyed by this decision. Other cricket fans won't be too happy about this and that's not because two incredible bowlers may return; but that this process of banning and overturning the ban a month later has lacked transparency and looks crooked as hell. I have no explanation...

As far as the players go, if they do join the squad for the SA tour, I can only begin to imagine how the crowd will deal with them. The PCB has not treated them well, which is what we know for sure, and they have gotten true justice. Who knows? The process should have been thorough in the beginning, when they were assumed guilty before the hearings even began. That makes it highly unlikely for anyone to believe and trust them.

I don't know if they are guilty of doping or not, and I suppose no one knows. From what I have read about Nandrolone, it is quite possible that it can be produced endogenously. The Pakistani public will accept this reasoning and give them the benefit of doubt. I'd like to see some more testing and some independent scientific analysis of the results. For all we know, the Shoaib and Asif really could be clean as a whistle, and their dietary supplements may be the cause of the illegal substances.

This trial, retrial and so on has raised more questions than it has has answered, and I think this will continue for a while...

Monday, December 4

Reprieve for Akhtar and Asif likely outcome

From what I am reading, it seems like the verdict for tomorrows appeal process is likely to be in favor of the banned Pakistani bowlers, Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif. Most of the media reports and rumors seem to be pointing towards a reduction of the ban. I am genuinely surprised about this and I posted an article from the rumor mill a few days ago. From cricketzone.com...

...one of the members of the appeal committee Haseeb Ahsan said he was impressed with the way the bowlers presented their argument which gave the panel a new perspective in the case.
Whatever perspective the lawyers presented must have been pretty strong and pretty unique. Though these reports say that the ban might be reduced, according to their sources, the ban will not be lifted. From thenews.com.pk...
The committee which also includes doping expert Dr Danish Zaheer has taken a longer time to decide the case than expected but Haseeb said that such important issues cannot be dealt with in a hurry. “It is a matter of national importance and we wanted to give the players a fair chance to defend themselves,” he said.

Haseeb said that “personally he has reached the conclusion that the players did not get such a fair chance” during the proceedings of the inquiry tribunal last month.

“The lawyers of the two players especially Abid Minto who is representing Shoaib Akhtar have really fought the case well and several new points were raised during the proceedings of this committee which are quite important,” said Haseeb without revealing anything more.
There is no doubt that if this ban were to be reduced, it would aid Pakistan greatly. However, I think a reduction makes the entire process a complete mockery. Why did these players not hire hotshot lawyers in the first place? Was there not enough time? If the players were not adequately represented, then who's fault is that?

The evidence and the bottom line, as far as the public understands it, is that these two players doped up. They took a banned substance, which is illegal. The ban was harsh, yet fair and it was accepted by most. Though the players have a right to an appeal, I am not sure what could be so different now that it lets them off with a lighter punishment.

If Shoaib and Asif do get a lighter sentence, then the PCB and the appeals committee better have some really good reasons for it. If we let our star bowlers off the hook on this one, the international cricketing community is not going to let this one go easily. Will they accept this second verdict? This reprieve? They will have a hard time swallowing the fact that the PCB has succumbed to public pressure and reinstated the offending players. In fact, the ICC might even have a say in this matter and conduct their own dope tests. Nothing has been set in stone yet and I am just thinking out aloud, but I just hope the people in charge are considering all options thoroughly.

Saturday, December 2

Shahid Afridi finally gets dropped - What of Nazir?

Well, the PCB has finally done the needful! They have evicted Shahid Afridi from the Pakistan ODI squad against the Windies. It was a decision that should have come a long time ago.

I have never really been a big fan of Afridi. Though, I admit there was a period of about a season or two that I felt he was an integral part of the team. However ever since the Sri Lankan tour and the England tour, I felt he should have been dropped and shouldn't be a part of our teams World Cup plans. In a previous post, I present my reasons for dropping him from the ODI team. Here I explain why he should not be part of the test team. Both these posts, though a couple of months old, are quite valid as only a bit of cricket has been played since.

Some additions (2006 games only):

  • 14: ODI's played in 2006
  • 23: his highest score
  • 8.14: his average this year (Rana, Iftikhar Anjum, Shoaib Akhtar and Umar Gul have a higher average)
  • 114: total runs score (worst amongst all Pakistani batsmen)
Kamran Abbasi called this a "triumph of stupidity"...

This is a World Cup year. Pakistan are about to play their final home one-day series before that tournament. The campaign needs to be relaunched with a sense of optimism and an aura of positivity. Conditions in Pakistan are likely to be closer to the West Indies than conditions in South Africa will be.

Your star player, your talisman, your aggressor, your match-winner needs to rediscover his confidence. A combination of the West Indian attack and home conditions are an ideal formula to reinvigorate your champion and your campaign. The decision looks straightforward. The selectors, though, leave him out. Shahid Afridi out? The mind boggles and the logic wobbles. Nice one. Another triumph of stupidity from the men who want to be paid to do an important job badly.

It's interesting to note that the readers comments below his post surprisingly do not support him. In fact most of the people seem to think this is a good decision.

Afridi's time has come. He has played over 200 ODI matches, and as my analysis shows, his efforts do not validate his inclusion on the playing XI.

Sadly Afridi's exclusion has overshadowed Shahid Nazir's absence from this squad. Quite unfair considering how well he bowled against the West Indies. I feel bad for him, but I am glad he has shown his mettle against the Windies and the English side on the test scene. He is supposedly Pakistan best domestic cricket opening bowler, yet the PCB seem to be considering him only for the tests, and that too as just someone to fill the gaps. His 17 wickets in test cricket in 2006 came at an average of 30, which was the 2nd best average for any Pakistani bowler. I feel he should actually be on the playing XI in the first ODI.

Friday, December 1

What? Asif being exonerated of doping charges...

Found this link on Orkut...Don't know how valid it is. I do know that the appeals tribunal is set to release its verdict on Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif doping ban appeal.

Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is all set to exonerate Mohammad Asif from doping charges but the other tainted pacer Shoaib Akhtar is not likely to get any reprieve, claims local media.

Quoting PCB sources, a local daily claimed PCB would let off Asif, giving the youngster a benefit of doubt but chances are really bleak that temperamental Shoaib Akhtar would get the same favour.

The tribunal set up for hearing the appeals of Shoaib and Asif against their ban would announce its verdict in a day or two.

‘’However it is likely that Mohammad Asif would be absolved of all charges by giving him benefit of the doubt. While the sentence on Shoaib Akhtar of two years ban would be upheld,’ the daily said.

“According to sources, the tribunal consisting of Justice Fakhruddin, Dr Danish Zaheer and Hasib Ahsan reviewed the lawyers arguments during the appeal hearings,'’ it added.

It also claimed that the tribunal has refuted demands by Shoaib’s lawyer that the ‘’Rawalpindi Express'’ had not signed the new contract and hence dope laws were not applicable on him. PCB, however, scuttled the move by providing an old copy of Shoaib’s agreement, consisting of dope condition, which he had signed.

In contrast, Asif had neither signed any central contract or participated in any dope test awareness programme, the report claimed.