Thursday, January 18

The PCB reeks of double standards

Its interesting how Pakistan will play Mohammad Yousuf without a seconds thought but Shoaib Akhtar was sidelined from the first test match for 'fitness' reasons and lack of match practice. MoYo has not played any cricket since December. One could argue that he needs to play a couple of first class games prior to this. Mohammad Asif played exactly the same amount as Shoaib, yet he played the first test match too.

My argument is simple. Why these double standards? Its plain to see that there is something about Shoaib that management does not like. And they keep making excuses to sideline him. I agree that match fitness is crucial, then why don't those exact rules apply to other players? Inzi is far from fit, and was short of form, yet they persisted with him.

Shoaib is a proven match winner. The term match winner is thrown about a lot, so I'll explain what I mean. Shoaib has the ability to change the course of a game in a single spell. He has the ability to take 10 wickets. Of course he may not take any and might have an ordinary game, but when you have someone like him on the squad, who you know will cause problems for the opposition, why play around with his career, and the outcome of the game. Support the guy and give him the same treatment you give everyone else.

It was a stupid mistake to keep Shoaib Akhtar back in Pakistan playing with Rawalpindi. That cost us the first test match. The difference between the South African side and ours was that only 1 of our bowlers was decent enough to get a wicket. Umar Gul's injury or not, by flying Akhtar over on the first flight to South Africa, the selectors looked like complete idiots.

Once again, the PCB and the selectors have shown themselves to be a bunch of clowns, who don't have the best interests of the national team in their minds when they make their decisions. They claim the higher moral ground and speak against the arrogance of players and officials. Their dealings with Waqar, Mushtaq, Younis Khan, the ECB, all come to mind. Yet they are the biggest culprits of all. Their pompousness is ridiculous. They are there to advance the sport, serve the players and serve the nation. I feel like they're completely submerged in this gossipy world of 'he said, she said' type accusations and age old grudges against people who talk back against them. I agree that Shoaib think he's a real something something, but this comes with the territory. He IS a big shot. That's how he is supposed to act. He's our star bowler. I may not want to hang out with the guy and have tea with him, but I certainly want him to be wearing my country's colors and getting wickets.

People get fired, or get criticised, all the time around the world. Its not always acrimonious. Its not always mudslinging for days afterwards. The desi emotion driven bureaucracy at the helm of the PCB must be replaced by a professionals, who have a board in charge, so its not a dictatorship, some smart administrators with clear goals in mind.

9 comments:

M K Abbas said...

I totaly agree Omar - they toy with shoaib constantly out to make "an example" of him. If he is pompous, he has reasons for it - and by god we need a cocky hateful bastard on the field who makes the opposition weak in their bladders.
I say down with Bari and the PCB admin.

Yzerfontein said...

Even if Shoaib wasn't match-fit, it's nothing which a bit of nandrolone couldn't cure...

...on the other hand he might just break down and be on the next flight from South Africa.

Unknown said...

Yzerfontein makes a good point. Though inadvertently.

The drugs scandal will forever tarnish Shoaib career. But does the appeal hold any weight?

I read both reports. I think there is some uncertainty in the testing. It was always possible for nandrolone to be synthesized in the body due to his protein cocktails.

Lets give him the benefit of the doubt now?

The entire team is being tested next month. Lets re-evaluate our judgements till then.

Ahsan said...

hello there, came across this blog thanks to oba. anyways a couple of points:

i agree that the PCB needs to clean up its act and that the past few months have been especially illustrative of their general incapacity to be even minimally competent. HOWEVER, i'm afraid i can't agree with you about shoaib.

you say there are double standards because yousuf is allowed to play immediately after a break but shoaib is not. this is somewhat disingenuous. first of all, yousuf is a batsman, fitness is of less importance to him because he doesnt have to run at full speed 30 meters at a time some 100-120 times a day. secondly, surely you cannot compare their layoffs? yousuf hasnt played for a couple of months at the most (here i am talking about international level cricket) whereas shoaib hasnt played a test for 12 months. even the one-day series in england, which was purportedly the new-and-improved-fully-fit shoaib, saw him break down. the point is that given (a) shoaib's track record with injuries and (b) the length of his layoff, it is perfectly justfiable for him to have to go through more rigorous fitness tests than others (including asif, who you mention).

in your post, and in a couple of comments in respone to the post, i find it surprising that shoaib is somehow portrayed as a victim. if there *have* been double standards in pakistan cricket since his debut, he has only benefitted from them (and this is coming from someone, who until very recently, was a very big fan). his disciplinary problems, his lying about fitness, his constant complaints of not having a supporting cast (has murali ever said "i dont have anyone to help me take wickets"?), his prima donna personality and his work ethic has left a lot to be desired. despite this, he has been thrown numerous lifelines in the past, not least of all by khalid mahmood and shahrayar khan. what woolmer and inzi have done with him over the last 2 years is absolutely the right thing: play, but on our terms. its a great pity that that message wasnt delivered by earlier regimes.

shoaib has "played around with his career" more than anyone else could hope to. you really cant fault the PCB, in general, for the potential never being fulfilled in his career.

anyways, these are general points, but even the particulars don't really support your case. admittedly, i havent seen much of him lately, except watching him from the general stands at the national stadium in a 20-20 against peshawar (where, for what its worth, he got smashed around) and numerous photographs in the papers. all i can conclude on the basis of the evidence is that shoaib was overweight. he certainly didnt look like he could be relied upon to bowl 18 overs a day in a test match, with test match intensity and test match pressure. but thats just my opinion, feel free to disagree.

oh, one last thing - a shameless plug for our blog: fiverupees.blogspot.com

Unknown said...

Ahsan, Thanks for the comments.


There are different criteria for fitness for both batsmen and bowlers. Obviously you're right. But even while taking those into consideration, you have to admit that MoYo is getting preferential treatement.

MoYo's numbers speak for themselves. Agreed. Obviously I want him to play the next game, but I am just stating that the PCB are saying one thing to one player and another thing to another.

They latest quote from Naeem Ashraf or one of his cronies is that Shoaib is fully fit. And this is just after one 4 day game in Pakistan. One game!?? What a load of BS. Is that the suffiecient "rigorous fitness tests" that you speak of? Why couldn't he have played against Rest of South Africa?

Lets say their argument was 'He didnt do well in the twenty20 domestic cup". Actually from the reports he did do well. He just didn't get wickets. Even Dravid failed in South Africa. What should India do? Not select him.

I know you like to differentiate between bowling and batting, so lets think of a bowling example. Kaneria for one, stands out. He is fit. Agreed. But is he in form? Who the hell knows! He just isn't taking wickets. Is that form or not?

Back to Yousuf and Shoaib. Shoaib has played more cricket in the past 2month than Yousuf.

Asif has to run and bowl 10-15 over/a day. And he is in.

Your arguments on cricketing reasons are followed up by comments on Shoaib's past, his attitutde towards the game and so on.


I actually have experienced a turn around in my opinion of Shoaib. Unlike you, I actually never liked the guy. I still don't particularly want to hang out with him, but no matter how arrogant he is, he single handedly thrashed England when they visited us last year...or couple of years back. He has changed for the better, and he is giving Pakistan as much as he can. This was not so a few years back with fake injuries and nakhras and all. Ever since the Australian tour, he was incredible.

Yes, he said besides him no one was taking wickets. Is that a lie? The only glimpse of hope on that Australian tour was Shoaib. He was the only one looking like taking wickets. Everyone else was terrible. So what if he says that? He's confidant, knows he's damn good, and should have every right to speak his mind. On his off days, he can party up in every bloody club in the world for all I care.

As a supporter of Pakistani cricket, just as you are, I want to see the best possible team on the field. And in my opinion he is an integral part of that ideal.

Thanks Ahsan, for your comments. Do you have a label for your cricket posts so I may link you from mine?

Ahsan said...

i'm trying to figure out a way to manage my posts so i can categorize them the way other blogs do. unfortunately i don't know how, so i will have to wait for NB, the guy who started the blog, to tell me more.

just a couple of quick responses (don't believe i'm indulging in this back and forth when i have 300 pages to read before tomorrow). i suppose i should have been clearer about shoaib and him going to SA. frankly he should have either gone from the start (something i didnt favor) or not gone at all (my preferred option). you're 100% right that this "ok-you-played-one-game-guess-you're-fit-then" argument is crap. but time will tell...maybe he picks up 19 wickets in the remaining 2 tests and i end up looking like a jackass. who the hell knows?

secondly, i should've been clearer about the distinction b/w form and fitness (your kaneria example). i don't think shoaib has EVER been out of form, every time he's played he's been a threat. i too believe that if fit, shoaib should always play. but only if fully fit, fully fit meaning being able to bowl 18 overs a day in a test, 15 of which should be at full pace. can you honestly say that you believe that's where shoaib is right now? again, i can only go by pictures in papers and the 20-20 game i saw (admittedly, he was bowling from the pavilion end and i was sitting in the general stands at the university road-sorry, mobilink end). he looked fat dude, he just looked fat. and carrying weight, on knees and ankles that have already had numerous problems in the last 3 years, with that run up, in that heat, is asking for trouble. but like i said, time will tell.

Unknown said...

Hey Ahsan,

Thanks for the response. Well...you may turn out to be right as well. If he plays according to his potential AND does not cause trouble, then he is ideal right? But then that's not the Shoaib Akhtar of the past, nor is that the Shoaib Akhtar we know. Can't have one without the other. You didn't want him to go on the tour? How come? You rate Rana, Nazir, Sami higher than him? Or are your judgements based partially on his discipline? True though: You're the one who saw him live charging in.

How many people came to watch the twenty20? How do you feel about that format?

True about the second point. Fair enough. He needs to shoulder his bowling responsibility.

Ahsan said...

i didnt want him to go on tour because in my opinion, and apparently in the opinion of some PCB officials, he wasn't fully fit. its not a question of rating anyone else higher than him, certainly not rana or shahid nazir (please don't mention the word "sami" ever again in any conversation with me. thanks), it's just a question of his fitness. if im not confident that he can bowl 18 overs a day, then i dont see the point of him going on tour. personally, my favored attack would've been asif, gully and nazir. gully getting injured was a real killer, i think we missed him more than shoaib, or even yousuf for that matter.

as for 20-20, its just for laughs yaar. for me, even ODI cricket is kind of a joke (http://fiverupees.blogspot.com/2006/10/why-i-hate-one-day-cricket-i-just.html)
http://fiverupees.blogspot.com/2006/10/bringing-light-i-want-to-address.html
so 20-20 is on a whole different level. restrict it to domestic cricket, make some money off of it, have a bit of fun, and that should be the extent of it. my fear is that will definitely not be the course of action administrators take...there's already a 20-20 world cup on the cards not too far from now. if they replace ODI cricket with it, then fine. but i dont want to see any more test cricket eaten up by this nonsense. test cricket is the pure form of the game and there's not nearly enough of it played. i suppose one can only wait and see.

the only reason i went to the game was to see (a) gully and shoaib in action and (b) just to see live cricket in general. living in the west, i don't often get the chance to go to stadiums (stadia?) to watch cricket, so when i *do* get the chance, i want to avail it, even if its a dumb format of the game, that too being played domestically. it wasnt too bad, though not having an ABN-amro account never hurt me as much as it did that day.

Unknown said...

Hey - thanks again for the comments - Yeah - Gul was a big loss. But we need him for the world cup. so its a good thing they didn't play him in this game.

Im surprised they played sami as well. but worked out right?

My problem with your explanation is that you're relying on the PCB to give their assesment of fitness. I for one, have no clue what contritutes are 'fitness test' or so and so failed his fitness test. I don't really trust their word all that much. So he looked unhealthy in the twenty20, but then he did bowl 20 overs in the first class game. Im guessing he was fit, but lacking match practice. But after years of playing international cricket, im sure both batsmen and bowlers, who have been out for a few months know exactly how to get back in form. An unfit shoaib (if he is unfit) is still better than Rana or sami.

im with you there, i enjoy test cricket more too. i'll read your posts after monday. Im busy till then yaar. Chall thanks agains for the comments!